Uncategorized
TEST DRIVE: BMW iX M60 – Fast and exciting, but is the price premium above the iX 50 justified?
The BMW iX M60 is the second electric vehicle modified by BMW Motorsport. Following in the footsteps of the i4 M50, the BMW iX M60 is the top electric car

The BMW iX M60 is the second electric vehicle modified by BMW Motorsport. Following in the footsteps of the i4 M50, the BMW iX M60 is the top electric car from Munich for the time being. BMW welcomed us to Berlin, Germany, to spend a couple of days with the M-tuned electric crossover to highlight its performance and agility. Until recently, the BMW iX xDrive50 was the only iX model available in the United States, but consumers will soon have another option.
$20,000 iX 50 is more expensive.
The BMW iX M60 costs $106,095, which is much pricier than the iX xDrive50, which costs $83,200. But what do you receive in exchange for your increased cash? Adaptive Air Suspension is standard on the iX M60, although it’s an available extra on the xDrive50. The BMW iX M60 also comes standard with 21-inch wheels. Gesture Control and the Bowers & Wilkins surround sound system are standard features on the M60 but not on the xDrive50.
What you get for your more cash with the iX M60 is more power and performance. Both vehicles employ two electric motors, one at each axle, and the same battery pack, however the iX M60 is significantly more powerful. The base BMW iX xDrive50 produces 516 horsepower and 564 lb-ft of torque, while the M60 produces 610 horsepower and 811 lb-ft of torque. When the iX M60 is driven in the Personal and Efficiency modes, the power supply is lowered to a maximum of 532 hp (397 k) and 749 lb-ft (1,015 Nm). According to BMW, the iX xDrive50 accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds, which is much slower than the M60’s time of 3.6 seconds. So, if you want speed, the BMW iX M60 offers it like a true M vehicle.
More Torque To The Rear
But how did BMW increase the power of its fifth-generation eDrive? The solution is straightforward: transfer additional electrons from the battery to the back wheels. While it may seem to be simple on paper, the reality is somewhat different. The M engineers concentrated primarily on the performance of the rear motor on the BMW iX M60, which is 0.8 inch (20 mm) longer than on the iX xDrive50. As a result, there is more copper in the rotor to accommodate the additional electrons.
The inverter was the next source of power enhancement. The motors in the iX 50 have a maximum amperage of 600 amps, whereas the double-inverter in the iX M60 has a maximum amperage of 1200 amps. As a consequence, the rear motor produces 483 horsepower and 479 lb-ft of torque in sport mode with launch control. BMW engineers informed me that the front/rear bias in the iX M60 has shifted from 46/54 (iX 50) to 36/64. The top speed of the M-tuned iX is increased from 124 to 155 mph (with optional high-performance tires) or 130 mph on all-season tires. The highest torque is rated at 15,400 revolutions per minute.
All of that extra power comes at a cost. The BMW iX M60 has a range of 280 miles, compared to 324 EPA-rated miles for the ix Drive50. Thirty miles may not seem like much, but it may add up if you don’t often recharge the battery. It’s also worth noting that the 280-mile range is with 21-inch wheels, and BMW hasn’t provided a number for the optional 22-inch wheels.
The battery pack is the same as in the iX 50, with a net capacity of 106.3 kWh and a gross capacity of 111.5 kWh. The battery of the iX M60 can take up to 195 kW of DC fast charging and 220 kW of regenerative braking. However, snack charging is also crucial. Thus, 10 minutes of rapid charging provides around 93 miles (150 km) of range.
Automobiles with M-tuned but lower-than-usual M performance
The greater price tag necessitates more /M input. As with other M-tuned vehicles, the BMW iX M60 receives M performance driving applications such as steering, suspension, increased stability, and a custom ECU tune. The anti-roll bars are also M60-specific. They are strengthened by 10% and 20% in the front and back, respectively. The iX M60’s air suspension follows a distinct technological concept. BMW suspension engineers often begin with comfort and work their way up to sport. That tactic, however, was inverted in the top electric crossover.
The development team sought to make the iX M60 a much more aggressive and sportier ride than the iX 50 or 40, so they increased the suspension settings.
And this is especially visible at high speeds or while jogging on uneven ground that become rather bouncing.
Again, if the road is not smooth enough, the M sport suspension will be felt much more than in the other iX versions. Of course, the air suspension height is self-leveling, and each corner is adaptable, allowing it to compensate for unequal loads.
However, like with other BMWs with air suspension, the height may be manually altered if desired. Sportier electronic dampers make the large iX M60 move better and, as usual, can be changed through BMW’s standard array of driving settings.
Visually, there’s little difference between the iX variants, which is typical of M Performance vehicles. The 22′′ black wheels, optional Titanium Bronze finish, huge blue brake calipers, and 20 mm expanded rotors distinguish the iX M60 from the basic variants. The “M60” insignia is likewise matte black with Titanium Bronze accent. The M Sport Package comes standard on the iX M60, as predicted. The front bumper, though, seems to be the same, with the same grille and front air intakes. There are no M-style side mirrors on the iX, which is likely owing to the normal mirrors giving superior aerodynamics.
Expect little modifications to the inside of the regular iX. The colors, the seats, and the design are all the same. Inside, the BMW iX M60, although being a M Performance variant, is practically indistinguishable from its basic siblings. However, the basic iX has the nicest cabin of any BMW, so most M60 consumers will be satisfied. Impressive Straight Line Performance
The BMW iX xDrive50 electric SUV was already quick and competent. However, the iX M60 takes those capabilities to a whole new level. The M-lite iX accelerates quickly and linearly, achieving peak speed quickly. Our GPS test revealed a 3.6-second sprint from 0 to 62 mph (100 km/h). However, maximum Autobahn speeds come at a cost. At speeds exceeding 124 mph (200 km/h), the instrument cluster shows the battery diminishing around 1 mile every 9-10 seconds.
There weren’t many chances to push the iX M60 through tight turns, but when they did, the top crossover produced a controlled and balanced ride with some excitement from the rear-biased powertrain. Despite its large curb weight of 5,770 lbs (2,617 kg), the chassis seems firmer than the iX 50, with significantly less body roll. Naturally, the steering is more engaging in SPORT mode, but somewhat numb in COMFORT. And that’s not a terrible thing since I spent the most of my day driving about Berlin, which is both bustling and lovely.
BMW performed an excellent job of limiting interior noise to a minimum, resulting in a calm ride even at high speeds. If you want some noises in your life, Oscar-winning composer Hans Zimmer has you covered, as the iX M60 comes with the newest IconicSounds bundle. When it comes to sound, the Bowers & Wilkins – with 30 speakers and 4D sound – is a masterpiece of engineering.
The Augmented Reality technology is particularly fun to use within city centers, owing to the iDrive 8 infotainment system, and the 360-degree camera system and driver assistance capabilities are among the finest available in a BMW today.
Of course, the iX’s adaptive regenerative braking mode should not be overlooked. The regen feature makes use of sensors, cameras, and GPS data to help you recover the most energy in the shortest amount of time. The adaptive mode is exactly as excellent as it is in the i4 M50, and although the one-pedal B mode may appeal to diehard electric vehicle users, I prefer the former in the iX.
Is M Good Enough?
Some of BMW’s newer M Performance vehicles, such as the M240i and M550i, are as excellent as, if not better than, prior generation full-on M vehicles. The BMW iX M60, on the other hand, is a different story. The top electric crossover feels more like the iX 50 than an iXM. Sure, you get 100 extra horsepower and a few other M tricks, but you’re unlikely to use them very frequently. Instead, get the BMW iX M60 if you just want the quickest and most costly electric BMW on the market today.
Uncategorized
The Boys Greatest Powers Is Love

It’s no secret that, with a few notable exceptions, the supes in The Boys are a group of conceited, entitled, and egotistical individuals who will do everything to further their personal agendas. Their abilities come from Compound V, a mixture created to offer people the ability to achieve things that normal people cannot, but love is a more potent motivating factor that gives the story its core. The majority find their views anchored in love, or at least what they think to be love in some circumstances, whether it’s from members of the eponymous group or the supes themselves. The series wouldn’t have as much heart overall without this unadulterated feeling, and it would no longer rise above the level of being a demonstration of violence and evil schemes.

Our screens are immediately bombarded with messages about love. In the first episode, Hughie (Jack Quaid) is introduced with his devoted girlfriend Robin (Jess Salgueiro), but she is soon killed by an irresponsible A-Train (Jessie T. Usher). As he swears revenge for her passing and sets out on his mission to stop the supes, Hughie’s love for Robin emerges as his motivation and the catalyst for his entire arc. Naturally, Hughie soon develops feelings for Starlight (Erin Moriarty), and this love feeds his fire to stop the evil Seven from causing destruction everywhere they go. Now, he wants to do everything he can to support her, keep her safe, and ultimately, save her. Hughie’s love for her pushes him to go to depths he never dreamed he’d go, despite her persistent insistence that she doesn’t need saving. He starts injecting V-24 so he can fight back against individuals who mistreat other people. On the surface, it appears that he uses it selfishly and rejects Starlight’s warnings to quit putting himself in danger, but in his heart, he is acting in her best interests out of love.
In terms of selfishness, Billy Butcher (Karl Urban) is probably the most maniacal character on the show, ranking right up there with Homelander (Antony Starr), yet he has done everything for his wife, Becca, out of love for her (Shantel VanSanten). As payback for Homelander’s sexual assault of Becca, which he believes caused her death, he initially starts looking for the supes. He makes every effort to locate her after learning that she is still alive, but sadly, their reunion is brief because she perishes as a result of Ryan’s (Cameron Crovetti) deadly blast sent at Stormfront (Aya Cash). Butcher’s troubles are far from over, as he now has a new task to complete. Ryan’s safety was Becca’s final request. This pledge is what ultimately leads to maybe the best illustration of love triumphing over all. In the Season 3 finale, Butcher is finally given the opportunity to eliminate Homelander with the aid of Soldier Boy (Jensen Ackles), but she refuses to do so in order to preserve Ryan. His ultimate objective has been to kill Homelander from the beginning, but the strength of love comes through as he defies it to carry out Becca’s request. This deed demonstrates Billy Butcher’s heart, despite the moments when it seemed like he only cared about himself.

The protagonists are occasionally motivated by platonic love or familial love rather than romantic love. Homelander is undoubtedly not the first person who springs to mind when considering love, as he frequently behaves selfishly. He has, on a few rare occasions, though, displayed a more tender side to his character. Ryan, Homelander’s kid, is the object of his devotion in the most significant way. He hasn’t always been an ideal father figure, as evidenced by the moment where he pushes Ryan over the roof, but there have been times when Antony Starr has successfully portrayed a caring father. For instance, in the most recent season finale, Homelander rushes to save Ryan when he is hurt by Soldier Boy, placing himself in danger without thinking twice. Given how narcissistic Homelander has always been, it is a little surprising to realize that he is also capable of love. Homelander has occasionally displayed emotional sensitivity, but his love for Ryan compels him to prevent his son from going through the same suffering he did as a child growing up without a father.

Mother’s Milk (Laz Alonso), who is trying everything in his power to stop Soldier Boy, is another example of the extent to which a father can go in order to defend his family. After learning that Soldier Boy killed MM’s family, MM is now determined to stop it from occurring to his new family, particularly his daughter. In addition to abhorring everything supes stand for, he is outraged that Todd (Matthew Gorman), a rabid supe enthusiast, is raising his daughter. MM frequently finds himself facing up against strong supers armed with weapons he knows are inadequate to stop his enemies while well conscious of the risky scenarios he is placing himself in.
Out of genuine love for his daughter, he nevertheless continues to take the threat head-on. This is one of the few instances where love isn’t tainted by ego or used as a justification for moral relativism. This is demonstrated by the fact that Hughie and Butcher take V-24 without hesitation, but MM stands by his principles and declines to grant himself superhuman abilities. He is aware of the risks it poses, and he would rather fail while attempting to protect those he loves than give his daughter a negative example.
Even though the Boys universe is filled with gunfire, explosions, and bloodshed, if you look closely, you can see that love permeates everything. It appears in a variety of ways and is frequently combined with other feelings, but it dominates everything else and gives the series the heart it needs to stand out as a truly significant program.
Uncategorized
Taika Waititi Would Return for Thor 5 on One Condition

Thor: Love and Thunder, the latest feature picture from Marvel Studios, is now in theaters! The sequel, directed by Chris Hemsworth, reunited numerous cast members from previous Thor films, including, but not limited to, Dr. Jane Foster, who discovers she can wield Thor’s hammer Mjölnir, which provides her superpowers. Taika Waititi was back in charge as director. Thor’s character was revitalized by the New Zealand filmmaker in 2017’s Ragnarok.
If you watch Thor 4’s end credits all the way through, you’ll notice not only the conventional post-credit scene, but also a single but significant message: “Thor will return.” Now, no new Thor solo film has been revealed, nor has Hemsworth been confirmed to appear in any upcoming MCU production. However, the actor has previously claimed that he is eager to reprise his role as the character.
What about Waititi, though? Will he return to direct the third installment of the Thor franchise?
Waititi Talks About a Possible Thor 5

Thor: Love and Thunder director Taika Waititi spoke to Insider about his reaction to the “Thor will return” message at the end of the film, stating that he was initially unaware of its inclusion.
“So, guess what? That surprised me as well. I’m not kidding. I saw it in the theater and thought, “Oh my god. Really?” “What?” Chris exclaimed. But, of course, he’ll return. He’s the most interesting character. I mean, I may be biased, but he’s the most entertaining to watch.”
Waititi also talked about what it would take for him to make another Thor picture. He added one specific requirement: Chris Hemsworth must also return.
I’m not sure what happens next. I would definitely participate, but only if Chris did. But it would have to be something unexpected and surprising for me to want to do it. What, for example, would be the new perspective? The fights and combat are good, but when it comes to the story, I’d want something unexpected. As if you were filming a $5 million film with no combat at all, just Thor on a road trip. Like “Nebraska,”
Thor sequel?
There are numerous ways in which the next Thor film might be unexpected and unforeseen. Taika Waititi, who does not appear to be one to rest on his laurels, would most likely want to continue pushing the boundaries of what Thor and his film franchise can be.
Prior to Thor: Ragnarok, the character was a stoic warrior with the occasional wisecrack or amusing quip. For Hemsworth, this attitude had become so monotonous that he was considering leaving the part. Waititi brought his signature wacky, irreverent comic flair to the franchise when he joined. Love and Thunder is very much in the same style, and may even have increased the comic factor.
The director is certainly a fan of Thor, as indicated by his comments above. Saying “He’s the best character” is excellent praise, especially considering how many other wonderful Marvel characters there are. Taika Waititi listing Hemsworth’s participation as a supposedly hard and fast criteria for him to make another film says a lot. But the two get along well, and Waititi looks to know how to get the greatest performance out of the actor.
It should be noted that Waititi had previously been tight-lipped regarding his role in a possible sequel. He appears to have softened his tone after making those remarks.
As for the promise that the character will return, it’s curious that Marvel would include that without first consulting with Waititi or Hemsworth, but as the former stated, “of course he’ll be back.” After all, as previously stated, Hemsworth has stated his willingness to reprise his role as the Asgardian god of thunder.
Uncategorized
Why Taika Waititi Limited the Guardians in Thor 4

Following the theatrical release of Thor: Love and Thunder, reviews from fans and critics have been varied in terms of its comic tone and the disproportionate screentime given to its all-star cast. While some audience members wished for more of Natalie Portman’s Mighty Thor and Christian Bale’s Gorr the God Butcher, others felt that some characters, such as the Guardians of the Galaxy, were underutilized.
Thor, played by Chris Hemsworth, first met the Guardians of the Galaxy in 2018’s Avengers: Infinity War, shortly after Thanos killed Heimdall and Loki.
The connection between Thor and the Guardians team was one of the film’s best crossover moments, and Thor travels to Nidavellir alongside Rocket Raccoon (aka “Sweet Rabbit”) and Groot in search of a Thanos-killing weapon.
When Thor chooses to join the Guardians at the end of Avengers: Endgame, many fans anticipated an As-guardians of the Galaxy project or more of this successful crossover before Thor: Love and Thunder. Unfortunately, that is not what occurred.
Reality vs. Expectation

The rest of this article includes Thor: Love and Thunder spoilers.
Fans were naturally pleased to learn that the Guardians of the Galaxy would play a role in Thor: Love and Thunder, given their interactions in both Infinity War and Endgame.
People had yet to see Thor or Star-Lord and company in Phase 4, and because early promotion for Love and Thunder emphasized Thor’s hilarious encounters with Star-Lord, audiences expected these bits and exchanges to be only the tip of the comedic, cosmic iceberg.
However, the majority of what was revealed in the Thor 4 trailers and TV advertisements was the extent of the Guardians’ role in the film.
Due to the casting of Natalie Portman, Christian Bale, and Russell Crowe in the project, few expected the Guardians to be a part of the entire film due to its already crowded call sheet. Few expected the funny ragtag group to be reduced to background characters with less to say than the unremarkable alien ruler who gave Thor his screaming goats.
Why Did Thor 4 Require More Star-Lord?

Before the Guardians parted ways with Thor, each member of the cast had a brief exchange of words, with only Star-Lord having a genuine chat with the film’s star.
Even though Quill was essential in lowering Thor’s emotional shields and choosing love over heartache, the situation of their own relationship lacked context.
Quill certainly feels the urge to compete with the God of Thunder in Infinity War. Their final scene in Endgame seems to lay the setting for a comedic power struggle about who is in charge of the crew.

However, in Love and Thunder, while Thor is still seeking for dominance, Quill appears to have surrendered himself to Thor’s pranks and passively tolerates him.
Again, this is a 180-degree turn from Infinity War and Endgame, where Quill was starving for recognition. Clearly, their dynamic has shifted, but that shift is never articulated. It not only denies the audience that amusing relationship, but also the potential to relate back to previous MCU flicks.
Also, given Gorr’s danger to all gods, it’s strange that Quill wasn’t brought in for that phase of the plot. Quill did give up his godlike abilities in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, but given his heritage, he had a chance to contribute to the tale.
Why Did Thor 4 Require More Rockets?

Thor and Rocket formed a humorous, unusual team in Avengers: Infinity War. And, despite his own troubles, Rocket counseled Thor through Infinity War and Endgame, and even supplied the God of Thunder with a new eye.
But, other from a few quips in Love and Thunder, there was no catch-up between Thor and his “Sweet Rabbit,” which was especially odd given their previous personal encounters. In fact, it would have made more sense for Rocket to be Thor’s voice of reason rather than Star-Lord.
Why Did Thor 4 Need More Groot?

While Thor’s armory has always been an important part of his saga, Love and Thunder established that both his hammer Mjolnir and his new ax Stormbreaker are sentient.
Given Stormbreaker’s jealousy of Mjolnir in Thor 4, and the ax serving as a MacGuffin for the film’s third act, it’s remarkable that Groot was never reintroduced or even mentioned after sacrificing his arm to build Stormbreaker’s handle.
And, while Rocket and Thor had the closest relationship in the most recent Avengers films, Groot was along for the trip. Plus, Thor is one of the only characters who understands Groot!
Why Did Taika Waititi Restrict the Guardians in Thor 4?

When asked if there was a version of Thor: Love and Thunder with more Guardians, director Taika Waititi admitted that there was.
The following is the director’s statement:
“The plan was always to have one at the start and then move one. Because they have their own feature film. There was talk of having them return at the conclusion.”
Waititi felt that returning as a source of reinforcements would have been too repetitive and preferred Jane instead, saying:
“The issue is, it happens in every film. No more. There will be no more cavalry at the end. So we put that notion on the back burner. We only wanted Jane to enter at the end.”
Waititi has a valid point. Someone will swoop in at the last second to change the tide at a hero’s darkest moment, when all hope is lost, according to a long-standing trope in cinema and television.
The issue here is that Waititi created the very cliche he stated he intended to avoid, and he also stated that the Guardians were substituted out because they wanted Jane.
Was the decision appropriate for the story being told?
Absolutely. However, by electing not to employ the Guardians at this point in the film, their brief appearance at the beginning of the film feels less significant and more like an obligation.
While the film confirmed that the Guardians would travel to other planets to assist them in their grief over the loss of their gods, the lack of the MCU’s cosmic, comedic team appearing in any of that on-screen action – or even bothering to check in on their buddy Thor – makes their limited screentime all the more noticeable.
How Thor 4 Affects Infinity War, Endgame, and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

The issue now is that Thor’s team-up with the Guardians in Endgame will not have the same impact or enthusiasm as it had in Love and Thunder.
Because Thor’s time with the crew barely moved the needle on his own voyage and finished as swiftly as it began, it will appear as an useless detour or hiatus rather than an exciting next chapter in the God of Thunder’s adventure.
While Guardians director James Gunn has kept the script for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 under wraps, many expected Love and Thunder to handle some of the post-Endgame labor, allowing Vol. 3 to dive directly into its own tale.
Apart from Star-Lord mentioning his anguish for Gamora’s death, there was no mention of his desire to find her Variant (which is something Endgame seemingly laid the groundwork for).
Not only will Vol. 3 need to revisit that story point, but so will Thor’s departure from the Avengers and the Guardians’ assistance to planets that lost their gods in Thor 4. It’s almost as if they were assigned tasks to complete rather than adding to this story.
Overall, Marvel Studios granting creative flexibility to filmmakers and writers is a good thing for filmmaking, storytelling, and the Marvel brand. However, it can also be detrimental.
While the Marvel Cinematic Universe laid the scenario for the Guardians of the Galaxy to have an impact on Thor Odinson’s saga, Taika clearly did not want that to happen. He preferred a Jane Foster story.

Looking at Thor: Love and Thunder through the lens of the Thor franchise, Taika’s judgment is sound. The problem is that he’s much bigger than that.
Thor is a prominent protagonist in the larger cinematic universe, and he was coupled with an ensemble cast whose characters played important roles in Thor’s voyage in one of the biggest crossover blockbusters in cinema history.
Ignoring that, as well as the Guardians’ only capability for humor and action in the cosmos, explains why their little roles in Love and Thunder were not only unsettling but also a waste.
If there’s one thing Thor: The Dark World did better than Thor: Love and Thunder, it’s that the first Thor sequel included events from both 2011’s Thor and 2012’s The Avengers into its plot.
Aside from a training montage and the presence of Stormbreaker, Thor 4 appears to have had no interest in continuing or resolving storylines introduced in Endgame.
Yes, Thor: Love and Thunder is a Thor film and a Taika Waititi film, but it has little interest in being an MCU feature, except from a few Easter eggs.
Thor: The Dark World is currently in theaters.
-
Marvel9 months ago
The release date for Marvel’s “Agatha: House of Harkness” on Disney+ has been revealed.
-
Marvel9 months ago
Sony Updates Tom Holland’s Spider-Man 4 with Promising News
-
Stories12 months ago
Monica Bellucci’s seductive style is shown in 29 images.
-
Marvel9 months ago
Why Does She-Hulk’s Looks So Bad?
-
Stories12 months ago
28 Unseen Sexy Photos of Olivia Rodrigo on the Internet
-
Stories10 months ago
Lauren Andrews is….Wow (40 Photos)
-
Stories10 months ago
Hailey Grice is a babe (41 Photos)
-
Uncategorized9 months ago
Marvel: Eight Major Differences Between the Hulk and She-Hulk