Connect with us


Which BMW M3 should you buy?

BMW M will officially celebrate its 50th anniversary in 2022. This causes one to recall one of the most iconic BMWs ever produced by the M division – the M

BMW M will officially celebrate its 50th anniversary in 2022. This causes one to recall one of the most iconic BMWs ever produced by the M division – the M3. The M3 has always offered a blend of agility and straight-line performance, from a normally aspirated four-cylinder engine to a twin-turbo six-cylinder engine and beyond. The M3 has come a long way from its modest beginnings in 1986, with successive iterations proving not just to be the most successful touring vehicle in history, but also the best-selling M product of all time.

And if you’ve never driven an M3, you may be wondering whether the buzz is true. After all, the E30 M3 only has roughly 200 horsepower, which isn’t exactly intimidating in a market full of 300 horsepower hatchbacks. Even the formidable V8-powered M3 takes around four and a half seconds to accelerate from 0-60. Teslas, the drag strip superstar, aren’t exactly snoozing.

When it comes to the M3, I’ve realized that there’s a lot more to it than just the statistics. Even if you’re solely interested in bench racing, the G80 M3 – with xDrive testing 0-60 speeds under 3 seconds – will undoubtedly fulfill your hunger. To get to the point, there is an M3 for everyone, and today we’ll look at which one could be right for you.

Which BMW M3 is for you?

The E30 M3, which was introduced in 1986, is today one of the poorest deals available in terms of by-the-numbers performance. In today’s horsepower battles, 0-60 takes half of the average male life expectancy, while the four-cylinder S14 engine produces 192 horsepower and 170 pound-feet of torque. What does register is the car’s sub-3000 pound weight and redline of 7250 rpm. Special variants, which are now available in the United States, go a step further, with top-tier (and most expensive) Sport Evolution vehicles producing a whopping 235 horsepower.

Which BMW M3 is for you?

Though the E30 M3 is a compelling momentum vehicle, costs have soared, making decent examples difficult to justify. Anything with less than 100,000 kilometers will cost around twice the original $34,000 MSRP. If you’re searching for something affordable, the E30 M3 isn’t it.

Repair costs may be considerable, kilometers are costly (every thousand miles driven depreciates the automobile significantly), and the car is just not quick. Its allure stems not just from its simple and now iconic appearance, but also from its self-assured dynamics, which enable it to be driven at 9/10ths all the time, no matter where you are. The E30 M3 remains the monarch of high-priced M3s, fetching up to a quarter-million dollars, and is well worth every cent if you can afford it.

Which BMW M3 is for you?

The E36 M3 was introduced in North America in 1995 with a modified version of the RoW (rest-of-world, i.e. outside of North America) S50 engine. With 240 horsepower and 236 pound-feet of torque, it’s a dubious bargain over the 328i, which has a comparable weight balance and just thirty horsepower fewer.

But it does provide a significantly different driving experience — with different suspension and brakes, power delivery and a differential, interior, and other minor changes, the M3 quickly distinguishes itself from its non-M counterparts. And RoW M3s add to the confusion, with niceties like separate throttle bodies and up to 321 horsepower, but real-world performance that isn’t noticeably different from North American vehicles.

Which BMW M3 is for you?

On paper, the RoW E36 M3 finds the ideal blend of incredible power and weight balance, originality, overall dependability, and pricing. However, components may be prohibitively costly, real-world performance isn’t much different, and I’m never persuaded it performs anything better than its replacement, the E46 M3.

But it bears mentioning that the ZF five-speed manual shifts much better than the Getrag in the E46. The E36 also weights somewhat less. And the interior is a little more austere, and either engine – North America or RoW – is a little more dependable than the E46’s S54. Thus, the E36 M3 is the ideal M3 for someone who wants most of the drama of the E46 M3, but just half the hassle – which will enough for some.

Which BMW M3 is for you?

The E46 M3 is considered a “icon” by most automobile aficionados. It’s a tired cliché, but it fits in with the rest of the chassis’s glowing reviews. The excellent S54 inline-six engine provides an auditory experience unsurpassed by any other M3 – save maybe one – and the vehicle effortlessly revs to a nearly 8000 rpm redline. It was only available as a coupe or convertible and shared relatively few components with the non-M 3 Series, making it seem much more distinctive. Add the optional “Competition Package” for features such as stronger brakes, larger wheels, extra traction control settings, and more.

But with every rose-colored race to the finish line comes a slew of thorns. When everything is working properly, the E46 M3 is an extremely delightful vehicle to drive. However, in general, it will need a significant amount of time, money, and mechanical know-how to fully appreciate. Because of the scale and variety of troubles that the vehicle might encounter, I believe that if you can’t afford a new BMW, you probably can’t afford to maintain an E46 M3.

Which BMW M3 is for you?

Especially when combined with the “F1-inspired” SMG automatic manual transmission. As a result, the E46 M3 is my pick for anybody who really wants to appreciate the vehicle that established the M3 as the “Ultimate Driving Machine” – and has the time, money, and/or expertise to back it up. It’s the most balanced and, perhaps, the most gratifying M3 to drive. However, it is not for the faint of heart. It’s going to shatter a lot. And you’re still being smoked by grams in her TRD Pro Camry from a stoplight. If none of it bothers you, the E46 M3 is probably for you.

M3 E90/F92/E93

Which BMW M3 is for you?

The E90, E92, and E93 M3 added a powerful V8 engine to the M3 range. They’re the only ones who understand, and although the “race-inspired” provenance is sometimes exploited as marketing speak for “the racing crew glanced at it once,” the S65 really talks the walk. The 4.0-liter V8 weighs less than 500 pounds, which is around 30 pounds less than the previous S54, which had two less cylinders. And it was created at the Landshut foundry, which also produces the BMW Sauber Formula One engines.

Don’t forget that it has an operatic crescendo to 8300 rpm and a peak horsepower of 414. That’s not awful, but the E9X M3s improve on it. Consider it a look into the future. Carbon roof, current navigation systems, a decent automatic gearbox, and electronic damping all make their debut appearances on an M3.

Though not without shortcomings, the E9X M3s do an excellent job of bridging the gap between the sterile-feeling later models of the M3 and the slower-but-entertaining earlier vehicles. The E9X M3 is ideal as a “second” BMW – that is, you are experienced and prepared with maintaining a German driving machine, and are willing to get your hands filthy and your pocket empty.

It’s a fantastic vehicle to drive, although it weighs somewhat more than the E46 and drives slightly bigger. The E9X is also a good everyday driver, particularly when kept stock – just be cautious with maintenance. Furthermore, a vehicle without GPS and DCT provides one of the most exhilarating driving experiences ever given. It’s not a trade-off; it’s a Swiss army knife with a banshee-screaming V8.

M3 and M4 F80/F82/F83

Which BMW M3 is for you?

The F80 M3 arrived with its twin-turbocharged S55 engine after four generations and almost three decades of naturally-aspirated M power. And it enraged a lot of people – and it still does. But it’s difficult to argue with the stats, which include 444 horsepower in Competition Package trim and a fully reckless 406 pound-feet of torque available from only 1850 rpm. The end result? The F80 M3 and F82/83 M4 Coupe and Convertible could do burnouts and cause oversteer like no other M3, to to the dismay of the 0-60 bench racing community.

Which BMW M3 is for you?

The F80 and its platform companions are always evolving. There’s no hydraulic steering, no option to remove the large screen in the center console, and you can choose between driving modes on the fly, adjusting everything from throttle response to suspension firmness. Making it even more of an outcast in the M3 world is the fact that it almost never breaks; apart from different gaskets, there isn’t much that frequently fails on these vehicles, even after many years.

As a result, the Jekyll and Hyde F80 and pals are ideal for anybody looking for a high-performance vehicle. The constant presence of a screen detracts from the driving experience somewhat, but the convenience pays dividends on a daily basis. And Hyde is there around the corner, ready to explode into a burnout at any moment. It’s also an excellent choice for someone who like to drive sideways on a regular basis. It’s also a terrific one-car option, particularly in four-door M3 form, since it’s thrilling enough for aimless weekend drives yet practical enough to transport your pals to and from the bar.

M3 and M4 G80/G82/G83

Which BMW M3 is for you?

The G80 M3, as well as the G82 G83 M4 coupe and convertible, have arrived. And, regrettably, I don’t have much to say about them — they provide many of the same benefits as their predecessors. With the addition of an optional xDrive AWD system, this vehicle is the quickest through town and the most stable in bends of any M3. There is no replacement for the newest in terms of performance and sheer number crunching.

And, like every other M3 and M4, an audible group is shouting at the top of their lungs to everyone who will listen that the feel is gone. The light has been out, and BMW M has lost their way for the 50th year in a row. However, the stats don’t agree — on paper, the G8X is the best performing M3 and M4 ever made. And if that’s the type of message you want to be connected with, the G8X automobiles are for you. To be fair, it’s also a safe bet that they’ll be quite dependable, given that so much of the engine is built on expertise gained throughout the S55 development cycle.


Hopefully, you’ve learnt something new about an M3 or two today. And if you’re thinking about purchasing one, perhaps this guide has given you a decent idea of what each automobile performs well and what it may signify to other fans. That being said, the best method to find out is to drive, and I recommend that you drive as many as possible before deciding on one. Best wishes!


The Boys Greatest Powers Is Love

It’s no secret that, with a few notable exceptions, the supes in The Boys are a group of conceited, entitled, and egotistical individuals who will do everything to further their personal agendas. Their abilities come from Compound V, a mixture created to offer people the ability to achieve things that normal people cannot, but love is a more potent motivating factor that gives the story its core. The majority find their views anchored in love, or at least what they think to be love in some circumstances, whether it’s from members of the eponymous group or the supes themselves. The series wouldn’t have as much heart overall without this unadulterated feeling, and it would no longer rise above the level of being a demonstration of violence and evil schemes.

The Boys

Our screens are immediately bombarded with messages about love. In the first episode, Hughie (Jack Quaid) is introduced with his devoted girlfriend Robin (Jess Salgueiro), but she is soon killed by an irresponsible A-Train (Jessie T. Usher). As he swears revenge for her passing and sets out on his mission to stop the supes, Hughie’s love for Robin emerges as his motivation and the catalyst for his entire arc. Naturally, Hughie soon develops feelings for Starlight (Erin Moriarty), and this love feeds his fire to stop the evil Seven from causing destruction everywhere they go. Now, he wants to do everything he can to support her, keep her safe, and ultimately, save her. Hughie’s love for her pushes him to go to depths he never dreamed he’d go, despite her persistent insistence that she doesn’t need saving. He starts injecting V-24 so he can fight back against individuals who mistreat other people. On the surface, it appears that he uses it selfishly and rejects Starlight’s warnings to quit putting himself in danger, but in his heart, he is acting in her best interests out of love.

In terms of selfishness, Billy Butcher (Karl Urban) is probably the most maniacal character on the show, ranking right up there with Homelander (Antony Starr), yet he has done everything for his wife, Becca, out of love for her (Shantel VanSanten). As payback for Homelander’s sexual assault of Becca, which he believes caused her death, he initially starts looking for the supes. He makes every effort to locate her after learning that she is still alive, but sadly, their reunion is brief because she perishes as a result of Ryan’s (Cameron Crovetti) deadly blast sent at Stormfront (Aya Cash). Butcher’s troubles are far from over, as he now has a new task to complete. Ryan’s safety was Becca’s final request. This pledge is what ultimately leads to maybe the best illustration of love triumphing over all. In the Season 3 finale, Butcher is finally given the opportunity to eliminate Homelander with the aid of Soldier Boy (Jensen Ackles), but she refuses to do so in order to preserve Ryan. His ultimate objective has been to kill Homelander from the beginning, but the strength of love comes through as he defies it to carry out Becca’s request. This deed demonstrates Billy Butcher’s heart, despite the moments when it seemed like he only cared about himself.

The Boys

The protagonists are occasionally motivated by platonic love or familial love rather than romantic love. Homelander is undoubtedly not the first person who springs to mind when considering love, as he frequently behaves selfishly. He has, on a few rare occasions, though, displayed a more tender side to his character. Ryan, Homelander’s kid, is the object of his devotion in the most significant way. He hasn’t always been an ideal father figure, as evidenced by the moment where he pushes Ryan over the roof, but there have been times when Antony Starr has successfully portrayed a caring father. For instance, in the most recent season finale, Homelander rushes to save Ryan when he is hurt by Soldier Boy, placing himself in danger without thinking twice. Given how narcissistic Homelander has always been, it is a little surprising to realize that he is also capable of love. Homelander has occasionally displayed emotional sensitivity, but his love for Ryan compels him to prevent his son from going through the same suffering he did as a child growing up without a father.

The Boys

Mother’s Milk (Laz Alonso), who is trying everything in his power to stop Soldier Boy, is another example of the extent to which a father can go in order to defend his family. After learning that Soldier Boy killed MM’s family, MM is now determined to stop it from occurring to his new family, particularly his daughter. In addition to abhorring everything supes stand for, he is outraged that Todd (Matthew Gorman), a rabid supe enthusiast, is raising his daughter. MM frequently finds himself facing up against strong supers armed with weapons he knows are inadequate to stop his enemies while well conscious of the risky scenarios he is placing himself in.

Out of genuine love for his daughter, he nevertheless continues to take the threat head-on. This is one of the few instances where love isn’t tainted by ego or used as a justification for moral relativism. This is demonstrated by the fact that Hughie and Butcher take V-24 without hesitation, but MM stands by his principles and declines to grant himself superhuman abilities. He is aware of the risks it poses, and he would rather fail while attempting to protect those he loves than give his daughter a negative example.


Even though the Boys universe is filled with gunfire, explosions, and bloodshed, if you look closely, you can see that love permeates everything. It appears in a variety of ways and is frequently combined with other feelings, but it dominates everything else and gives the series the heart it needs to stand out as a truly significant program.

Continue Reading


Taika Waititi Would Return for Thor 5 on One Condition

Thor: Love and Thunder, the latest feature picture from Marvel Studios, is now in theaters! The sequel, directed by Chris Hemsworth, reunited numerous cast members from previous Thor films, including, but not limited to, Dr. Jane Foster, who discovers she can wield Thor’s hammer Mjölnir, which provides her superpowers. Taika Waititi was back in charge as director. Thor’s character was revitalized by the New Zealand filmmaker in 2017’s Ragnarok.

If you watch Thor 4’s end credits all the way through, you’ll notice not only the conventional post-credit scene, but also a single but significant message: “Thor will return.” Now, no new Thor solo film has been revealed, nor has Hemsworth been confirmed to appear in any upcoming MCU production. However, the actor has previously claimed that he is eager to reprise his role as the character.

What about Waititi, though? Will he return to direct the third installment of the Thor franchise?

Waititi Talks About a Possible Thor 5


Thor: Love and Thunder director Taika Waititi spoke to Insider about his reaction to the “Thor will return” message at the end of the film, stating that he was initially unaware of its inclusion.

“So, guess what? That surprised me as well. I’m not kidding. I saw it in the theater and thought, “Oh my god. Really?” “What?” Chris exclaimed. But, of course, he’ll return. He’s the most interesting character. I mean, I may be biased, but he’s the most entertaining to watch.”

Waititi also talked about what it would take for him to make another Thor picture. He added one specific requirement: Chris Hemsworth must also return.

I’m not sure what happens next. I would definitely participate, but only if Chris did. But it would have to be something unexpected and surprising for me to want to do it. What, for example, would be the new perspective? The fights and combat are good, but when it comes to the story, I’d want something unexpected. As if you were filming a $5 million film with no combat at all, just Thor on a road trip. Like “Nebraska,”

Thor sequel?

There are numerous ways in which the next Thor film might be unexpected and unforeseen. Taika Waititi, who does not appear to be one to rest on his laurels, would most likely want to continue pushing the boundaries of what Thor and his film franchise can be.

Prior to Thor: Ragnarok, the character was a stoic warrior with the occasional wisecrack or amusing quip. For Hemsworth, this attitude had become so monotonous that he was considering leaving the part. Waititi brought his signature wacky, irreverent comic flair to the franchise when he joined. Love and Thunder is very much in the same style, and may even have increased the comic factor.

The director is certainly a fan of Thor, as indicated by his comments above. Saying “He’s the best character” is excellent praise, especially considering how many other wonderful Marvel characters there are. Taika Waititi listing Hemsworth’s participation as a supposedly hard and fast criteria for him to make another film says a lot. But the two get along well, and Waititi looks to know how to get the greatest performance out of the actor.

It should be noted that Waititi had previously been tight-lipped regarding his role in a possible sequel. He appears to have softened his tone after making those remarks.

As for the promise that the character will return, it’s curious that Marvel would include that without first consulting with Waititi or Hemsworth, but as the former stated, “of course he’ll be back.” After all, as previously stated, Hemsworth has stated his willingness to reprise his role as the Asgardian god of thunder.

Continue Reading


Why Taika Waititi Limited the Guardians in Thor 4

Following the theatrical release of Thor: Love and Thunder, reviews from fans and critics have been varied in terms of its comic tone and the disproportionate screentime given to its all-star cast. While some audience members wished for more of Natalie Portman’s Mighty Thor and Christian Bale’s Gorr the God Butcher, others felt that some characters, such as the Guardians of the Galaxy, were underutilized.

Thor, played by Chris Hemsworth, first met the Guardians of the Galaxy in 2018’s Avengers: Infinity War, shortly after Thanos killed Heimdall and Loki.

The connection between Thor and the Guardians team was one of the film’s best crossover moments, and Thor travels to Nidavellir alongside Rocket Raccoon (aka “Sweet Rabbit”) and Groot in search of a Thanos-killing weapon.

When Thor chooses to join the Guardians at the end of Avengers: Endgame, many fans anticipated an As-guardians of the Galaxy project or more of this successful crossover before Thor: Love and Thunder. Unfortunately, that is not what occurred.

Reality vs. Expectation


The rest of this article includes Thor: Love and Thunder spoilers.

Fans were naturally pleased to learn that the Guardians of the Galaxy would play a role in Thor: Love and Thunder, given their interactions in both Infinity War and Endgame.

People had yet to see Thor or Star-Lord and company in Phase 4, and because early promotion for Love and Thunder emphasized Thor’s hilarious encounters with Star-Lord, audiences expected these bits and exchanges to be only the tip of the comedic, cosmic iceberg.

However, the majority of what was revealed in the Thor 4 trailers and TV advertisements was the extent of the Guardians’ role in the film.

Due to the casting of Natalie Portman, Christian Bale, and Russell Crowe in the project, few expected the Guardians to be a part of the entire film due to its already crowded call sheet. Few expected the funny ragtag group to be reduced to background characters with less to say than the unremarkable alien ruler who gave Thor his screaming goats.

Why Did Thor 4 Require More Star-Lord?


Before the Guardians parted ways with Thor, each member of the cast had a brief exchange of words, with only Star-Lord having a genuine chat with the film’s star.

Even though Quill was essential in lowering Thor’s emotional shields and choosing love over heartache, the situation of their own relationship lacked context.

Quill certainly feels the urge to compete with the God of Thunder in Infinity War. Their final scene in Endgame seems to lay the setting for a comedic power struggle about who is in charge of the crew.


However, in Love and Thunder, while Thor is still seeking for dominance, Quill appears to have surrendered himself to Thor’s pranks and passively tolerates him.

Again, this is a 180-degree turn from Infinity War and Endgame, where Quill was starving for recognition. Clearly, their dynamic has shifted, but that shift is never articulated. It not only denies the audience that amusing relationship, but also the potential to relate back to previous MCU flicks.

Also, given Gorr’s danger to all gods, it’s strange that Quill wasn’t brought in for that phase of the plot. Quill did give up his godlike abilities in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, but given his heritage, he had a chance to contribute to the tale.

Why Did Thor 4 Require More Rockets?


Thor and Rocket formed a humorous, unusual team in Avengers: Infinity War. And, despite his own troubles, Rocket counseled Thor through Infinity War and Endgame, and even supplied the God of Thunder with a new eye.

But, other from a few quips in Love and Thunder, there was no catch-up between Thor and his “Sweet Rabbit,” which was especially odd given their previous personal encounters. In fact, it would have made more sense for Rocket to be Thor’s voice of reason rather than Star-Lord.

Why Did Thor 4 Need More Groot?


While Thor’s armory has always been an important part of his saga, Love and Thunder established that both his hammer Mjolnir and his new ax Stormbreaker are sentient.

Given Stormbreaker’s jealousy of Mjolnir in Thor 4, and the ax serving as a MacGuffin for the film’s third act, it’s remarkable that Groot was never reintroduced or even mentioned after sacrificing his arm to build Stormbreaker’s handle.

And, while Rocket and Thor had the closest relationship in the most recent Avengers films, Groot was along for the trip. Plus, Thor is one of the only characters who understands Groot!

Why Did Taika Waititi Restrict the Guardians in Thor 4?


When asked if there was a version of Thor: Love and Thunder with more Guardians, director Taika Waititi admitted that there was.

The following is the director’s statement:

“The plan was always to have one at the start and then move one. Because they have their own feature film. There was talk of having them return at the conclusion.”

Waititi felt that returning as a source of reinforcements would have been too repetitive and preferred Jane instead, saying:

“The issue is, it happens in every film. No more. There will be no more cavalry at the end. So we put that notion on the back burner. We only wanted Jane to enter at the end.”

Waititi has a valid point. Someone will swoop in at the last second to change the tide at a hero’s darkest moment, when all hope is lost, according to a long-standing trope in cinema and television.

The issue here is that Waititi created the very cliche he stated he intended to avoid, and he also stated that the Guardians were substituted out because they wanted Jane.

Was the decision appropriate for the story being told?

Absolutely. However, by electing not to employ the Guardians at this point in the film, their brief appearance at the beginning of the film feels less significant and more like an obligation.

While the film confirmed that the Guardians would travel to other planets to assist them in their grief over the loss of their gods, the lack of the MCU’s cosmic, comedic team appearing in any of that on-screen action – or even bothering to check in on their buddy Thor – makes their limited screentime all the more noticeable.

How Thor 4 Affects Infinity War, Endgame, and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3


The issue now is that Thor’s team-up with the Guardians in Endgame will not have the same impact or enthusiasm as it had in Love and Thunder.

Because Thor’s time with the crew barely moved the needle on his own voyage and finished as swiftly as it began, it will appear as an useless detour or hiatus rather than an exciting next chapter in the God of Thunder’s adventure.

While Guardians director James Gunn has kept the script for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 under wraps, many expected Love and Thunder to handle some of the post-Endgame labor, allowing Vol. 3 to dive directly into its own tale.

Apart from Star-Lord mentioning his anguish for Gamora’s death, there was no mention of his desire to find her Variant (which is something Endgame seemingly laid the groundwork for).

Not only will Vol. 3 need to revisit that story point, but so will Thor’s departure from the Avengers and the Guardians’ assistance to planets that lost their gods in Thor 4. It’s almost as if they were assigned tasks to complete rather than adding to this story.

Overall, Marvel Studios granting creative flexibility to filmmakers and writers is a good thing for filmmaking, storytelling, and the Marvel brand. However, it can also be detrimental.

While the Marvel Cinematic Universe laid the scenario for the Guardians of the Galaxy to have an impact on Thor Odinson’s saga, Taika clearly did not want that to happen. He preferred a Jane Foster story.


Looking at Thor: Love and Thunder through the lens of the Thor franchise, Taika’s judgment is sound. The problem is that he’s much bigger than that.

Thor is a prominent protagonist in the larger cinematic universe, and he was coupled with an ensemble cast whose characters played important roles in Thor’s voyage in one of the biggest crossover blockbusters in cinema history.

Ignoring that, as well as the Guardians’ only capability for humor and action in the cosmos, explains why their little roles in Love and Thunder were not only unsettling but also a waste.

If there’s one thing Thor: The Dark World did better than Thor: Love and Thunder, it’s that the first Thor sequel included events from both 2011’s Thor and 2012’s The Avengers into its plot.

Aside from a training montage and the presence of Stormbreaker, Thor 4 appears to have had no interest in continuing or resolving storylines introduced in Endgame.

Yes, Thor: Love and Thunder is a Thor film and a Taika Waititi film, but it has little interest in being an MCU feature, except from a few Easter eggs.

Thor: The Dark World is currently in theaters.

Continue Reading

Latest marvel Articles

Marvel2 months ago

Review Wakanda Forever: Black Panther.

You are kindly invited to a funeral by Marvel StudiosYou should be aware that this is the tale of Black...

Marvel2 months ago

For November 14th, 2022, see the MarvelBlog.

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever has finally arrived in theaters after four turbulent years, the passing of the franchise's leading character,...

Marvel2 months ago

Top MCU Film Villains.

The best villains in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) to date, in my opinion, would be chosen by a unanimous...

Marvel2 months ago

News for November 21st, 2022, on the Marvel Blog.

The latest MarvelBlog News is now availableThis week: Spiders are attempting to take control of your televisionSpiders are free with...

Marvel2 months ago

Review of the holiday episode of The Guardians of the Galaxy.

This weekend, Disney released the brilliant Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special, which is a treat for Marvel fans who...

Marvel2 months ago

News for November 28, 2022, on the Marvel Blog.

This week, Marvel is undergoing a seismic shift. To what extent will it affect the MCU? In the most recent...

Marvel2 months ago

The Upcoming MCU Titles on Disney

We've entered a comparatively rare gap in the MCU schedule with She-Hulk finished and Werewolf by Night's popularity waning after...

Marvel3 months ago

Marvel versus DC. Who has the hotter female actors?

DC and Marvel are the two most well-known superhero film companies. There are several points on which fans of these...

Marvel3 months ago

Each and Every Show That Inspired the Disney+ Series WandaVision

WandaVision’s frequent allusions to classic television shows are a major part of its humor. In January of 2021, WandaVision launched...

Marvel3 months ago

Who is the Wonder Man of Marvel Comics?
We had been expecting you, Simon Williams.

The following contains spoilers for some of Wonder Man’s comic book history, but will give you an overview of his...